Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: NPS & 278

December 09, 2016 10:08PM avatar
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to remember that at some point in the past 15 years, a flood washed out the fill on the south end of the bridge. Hence the difference in the photos and the need for a temporary bridge to span the gap during the equipment removal operation.

I hate to see it out in the weather, but Earl's right, the train sure looks sharp displayed on the bridge. I'm glad I got the opportunity to see it.

$.02,
-Jeff



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/09/2016 10:09PM by 74ford.
Subject Author Posted

NPS & 278

BodieCalifornia December 01, 2016 10:37PM

Re: NPS & 278

larryjensen December 02, 2016 08:52AM

Re: NPS & 278

rod December 02, 2016 09:38AM

Re: NPS & 278

larryjensen December 02, 2016 09:48AM

Re: NPS & 278

rehunn December 02, 2016 11:29AM

Re: NPS & 278 Attachments

Ken Martin December 05, 2016 07:45AM

Re: NPS & 278 Attachments

Earl December 07, 2016 11:34AM

Re: NPS & 278

GeorgeGaskill December 07, 2016 08:22PM

Re: NPS & 278

jim pallow December 07, 2016 05:17PM

Re: NPS & 278

pd3463 December 07, 2016 08:32PM

Re: NPS & 278

Earl December 07, 2016 08:49PM

Re: NPS & 278

cdaspit December 07, 2016 09:00PM

Re: NPS & 278

74ford December 09, 2016 10:08PM

Re: NPS & 278

Earl December 07, 2016 09:19PM

Re: NPS & 278

D&RGW 223 December 07, 2016 10:32PM

Re: NPS & 0577 (link) Attachments

rod December 08, 2016 02:07AM

Re: NPS & 278

dougvv December 08, 2016 06:28AM

Re: NPS & 278

jalbers December 08, 2016 08:22AM

Re: NPS & 278

larryjensen December 08, 2016 09:46AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login