Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

October 19, 2016 06:15AM avatar
The original 1898 version of the #09271 as shown in the Mar/Apr 1979 N G & S L Gazette did indeed have a Flanger applied to the lead truck, which to my surprise is not shown on the Folio Drawing in the Rio Grande Narrow Gauge Car Plans by Heimburger of the 1923 rebuilt version.

I'd have to say that I was under the impression that the flanger was retained on the rebuild as there was a #09271 picture at Gunnison taken by the late Bob Richardson that "appeared" to show the Flanger in place. The lead truck in all the pictures I've seen of the rebuilt version do not show Brake Rigging which lends me to think the Flanger would still be there.

My impression however may not be correct and only Jerry Day will know the answer to this question.

You are correct on the fact that the Flanger was always present on the snow train but don't forget that the #268 was also equipped with Priest Flangers as well.

EDIT: Bob Grandt's NG Pictorial VolX pg211 has the Bert Ward picture that shows the addition of the length of Rail added to the underside of the frame and that obscures the Flanger detail in the raised position. The Bob Richardson picture referred to above is on pg212 and shows the sunlit detail to which I base my impression on smiling smiley

PPS: Taking another look at the Bert Ward photo there is an airhose at the coupler end; as there is no Air-Brake cylinder visible then that would be confirmation of the Flanger retained.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 10/19/2016 06:46AM by Chris Walker.
Subject Author Posted

Gunnison Plow 09271 Attachments

rdamurphy September 27, 2016 07:39PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

John West September 27, 2016 09:45PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271 *Hijack

Casey Akin September 27, 2016 10:04PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271 *Hijack

dougvv September 27, 2016 10:34PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271 *Hijack

John Liebson February 10, 2018 09:12AM

Re: Hijack (weathering models) continued . . . drinking smiley

Russo Loco September 28, 2016 12:29PM

Both fall short of the new standard set by...

Brian Shoup October 19, 2016 04:30PM

: Both fall short of the new standard set by...

Dirk Ramsey October 19, 2016 10:44PM

Re: All fall short of the old standard set by Vera . . . sad smiley

Johnson Barr October 19, 2016 11:58PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

wishiwasincolorado September 28, 2016 01:10AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

John Liebson October 19, 2016 06:27AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

Casey Akin September 27, 2016 11:03PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

Chris Walker September 28, 2016 04:07AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy September 28, 2016 01:43AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

John K September 28, 2016 05:53AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

Chris Walker September 28, 2016 06:37AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy September 28, 2016 03:03PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy October 18, 2016 09:26PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy September 28, 2016 04:59AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy September 28, 2016 06:36AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy October 18, 2016 09:25PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

Chris Walker October 19, 2016 12:12AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy October 19, 2016 05:00AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

Chris Walker October 19, 2016 06:15AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271 Attachments

davegrandt October 19, 2016 09:52AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy October 19, 2016 05:42PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

jim pallow October 19, 2016 03:11PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

Chris Walker October 19, 2016 03:22PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

jim pallow October 20, 2016 04:21PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy October 19, 2016 03:35PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy October 20, 2016 07:30PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login