D&S and C&T 478-483 Swap idea
| July 27, 2015 09:11AM |
First post on this discussion forum, looking forward to being apart of this community!
An idea I have had for many years:
D&S: 473,476,480,481,482,483,484
C&T: 463,478,486,487,488,489, 492/497
Wouldn't it be appropriate for both railroads to have the locomotive numbers in order, as best as possible. Does anyone find that interesting, or is it just me!?
Included in the current deal would be, (478 and 486 for 483 and 484). Each get a working and non working engine...
Thoughts?
An idea I have had for many years:
D&S: 473,476,480,481,482,483,484
C&T: 463,478,486,487,488,489, 492/497
Wouldn't it be appropriate for both railroads to have the locomotive numbers in order, as best as possible. Does anyone find that interesting, or is it just me!?
Included in the current deal would be, (478 and 486 for 483 and 484). Each get a working and non working engine...
Thoughts?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
488 stops for water at Los Pinos tank on closing day Oct. 1979. Photo courtesy Don Richter
The NGDF was started by Don Richter and is currently operated in his memory by Nathan Holmes and others. Others who have contributed to the upkeep of this board are (in no particular order): Charles McCandless, Everett Lueck, Ted Wilton, Cole Adams, James Bane, John Moellmer, Jon Bentz, Linn Moedinger, lloyd lehrer, Rod Jensen, John Craft, Steven Forney, Herb Kelsey, Bill Ramaley, Russ Sperry (El Russo Loco), Josh McNeal, John West, Jim Armstrong, Bob Bergstrom, Greg Scholl, Blake Forbes Doug van Veelen and Mark Fuller.