Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: RGS #20

November 27, 2017 11:07AM avatar
The short answer is anything we could. Our philosophy has been to bring the hardest-to-get-at parts up to near new condition. Typically, these are parts not seen by most people and are such that much teardown would be needed to access them, should they fail. We have also considered cost in the equation as in the pistons which are not at new dimensions but have a lot of life left in them. Another example of trying to keep up appearances can be found with the two injector header valves. Both were cracked and could not be repaired. I made two new valves from scratch to replicate the old ones. Fortunately, this was volunteer labor, so it did not increase the cost. I wanted to save the smokebox, but it was so far gone that the net return would not have been worth it. Brake rigging will all be saved except for the four vertical levers which need to be replace to even up the brake force on the drivers.

Short story is that I hope most people will think the locomotive looks as bad mechanically as it did prior to restoration while giving years of service under steam.
Subject Author Posted

RGS #20 Attachments

Linn W. Moedinger November 27, 2017 05:37AM

Re: RGS #20

Mike November 27, 2017 05:49AM

Re: RGS #20

tomc November 27, 2017 06:24AM

Re: RGS #20

KevinM November 27, 2017 09:48AM

Re: RGS #20

Linn W. Moedinger November 27, 2017 11:14AM

Re: RGS #20

SR_Krause November 27, 2017 07:39PM

Re: RGS #20

Linn W. Moedinger November 27, 2017 11:07AM

Re: RGS #20

SR_Krause November 27, 2017 07:32PM

Re: RGS #20

Samart November 27, 2017 12:35PM

Re: RGS #20

MD Ramsey November 27, 2017 03:38PM

Re: RGS #20

Jim Armstrong November 27, 2017 04:21PM

Re: RGS #20

Linn W. Moedinger November 30, 2017 10:33AM

Re: RGS #20

Dave Vollmer November 30, 2017 12:02PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login