Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: RGS #20 frame

March 02, 2009 03:29PM avatar
Railroads have many different reasons. I know that in 30 years ago, they were far more concerned about the steam locomotives than the passengers. Now days, it is usually the passengers (and the lawsuits) that are the greater concern.

There are many reasons for the diesels. Here are two examples I've personally been there for:
-leading up to the NRHS convention in Huntington, WV...the 1225 was to make its first major foray outside of Michigan and meet the veteran excursion engine #765 at Lima, OH. They were then to double head from Lima to Huntington. The 1225 was 4 hours late in arriving at the Rob Ave. yards in Lima. She didn't have a speedometer, and so they had to quickly round up a pair of diesels to make her legal (or at least kosher for CSX). The d-evils were then dropped in Lima and the 765 took the point with her speedometer...they put on an awesome show from there. Sadly, the 1225 had additional troubles while there and the 765 had to lug her dead plus a 34 car passenger train through the mountains (any surprise that an NKP S-2 was the first locomotive to defeat d-evils head-to-head?)

-I had the pleasure of riding the 30+ car passenger train behind the 261 through the New River Gorge. It was an eventful day. Thanks to the my father's long time friend Tom Stevens being the engineer that day, I received a cab ride for the photo run by. I then had the pleasure of riding the tool car and watching the 261 turn on the wye near Hinton. Tom mentioned that the 261 was far slipperier than the 765, and we really saw it as she was nearly unable to make it around the wye. We then returned to Hinton to pick up the train. Then we had problems. I don't recall what they were...I think it was an airbrake failure on the 261...and we had to wait for a pair of d-evils to arrive and couple aboard.

My last experience with d-evils and steam was a couple years ago when the 765 had some break-in runs on the PRR between Ft. Wayne & Van Wert. The local road, so generous in the terms to allow her on their rails, also supplied a dynamic brakes equipped diesel to pull around. The dynamic brakes were used to simulate heavy trains and give the berk a workout.

Railroad managements change over time, and different policies have existed. Some roads insist on their engineer being at the throttle, some don't...some have had previous bad experiences with steam and insist on diesel backup. Let's not use track of how real railroads used to have many locomotives hot and ready to step in if needed. The NKP used to use two PA-1s on their top passenger train for if one failed...and I've heard stories from engineers about losing one of their modern diesels while out on the line. I can certainly understand their fears about fowling the line with a breakdown...something they wouldn't trust even with a lone GP-40.

---------------------------------------------
I can't wait to see #20 rolling again. I can't get over what a wonderful job is being done on #20. WoW! I'd sure love to see her go for a test run on the EBT...you know, a break in run, to make sure everything's fine...before shipping her across the country, make sure there isn't anything the Linn & the wonderful team would still like to fix in Strasburg...and give those of us in the East a chance to see her! spinning smiley sticking its tongue out
Subject Author Posted

RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger February 25, 2009 10:54AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Curtis_F February 25, 2009 12:16PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Samart February 25, 2009 05:16PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Will Gant February 25, 2009 07:31PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

South Park February 25, 2009 09:50PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger February 26, 2009 05:42AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

kbarnett February 26, 2009 09:55AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Chile John February 26, 2009 10:07AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

kbarnett February 26, 2009 10:33AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Chile John February 26, 2009 12:31PM

Re: RGS #20 frame Attachments

dandtsrr2 February 26, 2009 06:17PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Chile John February 26, 2009 07:45PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Rick Steele February 26, 2009 08:11PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Will Gant February 26, 2009 08:25PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

dandtsrr2 February 26, 2009 09:54PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Rick Steele February 27, 2009 07:58PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

dandtsrr2 February 27, 2009 09:57PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Rick Steele February 28, 2009 07:15AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

dandtsrr2 March 01, 2009 12:48AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

John Cole March 01, 2009 08:30AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Rick Steele March 02, 2009 07:10AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

myork March 02, 2009 03:29PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger February 26, 2009 05:30AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

HighCommander March 11, 2009 11:23AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger March 11, 2009 12:50PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

HighCommander March 11, 2009 02:30PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Will Gant March 11, 2009 03:12PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger February 26, 2009 05:27AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

rod February 26, 2009 10:13AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger March 02, 2009 07:38AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Will Gant March 02, 2009 10:28AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

mesaman3000 February 26, 2009 09:04PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger March 02, 2009 07:42AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

jcpatten February 27, 2009 05:19AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

mesaman3000 February 27, 2009 02:03PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

GeorgeGaskill February 27, 2009 03:11PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger March 02, 2009 07:45AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

SandingValve March 02, 2009 09:03PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

tractor February 27, 2009 01:20AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

K-27 Afficianado March 02, 2009 09:10PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Bill Dennehy March 09, 2009 08:29AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

John Hewlett March 11, 2009 04:20PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login