Narrow Gauge Railroad Discussion Forum
This is a forum for the discussion of narrow gauge and steam railroading with a primary emphasis on railroads operating in the US. While discussions of modeling are welcome, please try to limit such discussions to issues relating to the prototype. This forum is not associated with any organization or group, and the authors of each post are solely responsible for the content of their post.
The forum is open to anyone to read, however if you wish to participate, you will have to register, and to provide a valid e-mail address. When you do so, you will be sent a confirmation e-mail with a link which you can use to activate your account. You are free to use a handle as your screen name should you wish to do so, however we do ask that you provide a real name in the profile associated with your handle. Beyond that all we ask is that you accord yourself as if you were visiting a friend's house, or roundhouse. Remember, you are responsible for anything you say.
Rights to all posts are owned by their respective authors. All other content copyright 2001- 2010 NGDF, all rights reserved.
This board is owned and operated by
Don Richter. Others who have contributed to the upkeep of this board are (in no particular order): Herb Kelsey, Everett Lueck, Bill Ramaley, Rod Jensen, Russ Sperry (El Russo Loco), Josh McNeal, John West, Jim Armstrong, Bob Bergstrom, Greg Scholl, Blake Forbes, and Doug van Veelen.
Re: RGS #20 frame
Posted by:
Rick Steele (IP Logged)
Date: February 26, 2009 08:11PM
Having been on the UP Steam Crew, I believe that you are woefully misinformed as to the reasons for the diesels.
First off, the Steam Locomotive is more than capable of hauling the train. The Diesel is usually tagging along in notch 1 or idle. The main reason that the Diesel is there is to lessen wear and tear on the Passenger fleet.
How so, you may ask? Easy... A Steam Locomotive has no dynamic brakes. So downhill the equipment's brakes are what are being relied on to slow the train. I hate to put it this way, but getting Disc Brakes and installing them on old GSC (General Steel Castings) trucks is a very expensive and time consuming process. They are like disc brakes on a car, they are not easily available or replaceable like freight car brakes. Being a specialty item, are expensive to replace. Having a diesel along for the dynamic brakes just insures that the passenger equipment will be around for many years longer than they otherwise would be.
The 844 and 3985 have been through some very thorough and EXPENSIVE rebuildings in the past couple of years and are in no way any less (and are probably more) like the locomotives that they were built to be. Steve tells me that the 844 rides entirely differently and is much more powerful after its rebuild. It was no slouch before the rebuild, I remember hauling a Special Train outside of Boise at almost 100 mph (according to the tattle-tale hot box detector).
Just because the 844 or 3985 is hauling along a diesel doesn't mean that the diesel is working or that the Steam Locomotive isn't. If you don't like it, they you are perfectly welcome to not go and look and complain.
Rick Steele