Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&TSRR 484 & 488 Double Header above The Gash . . .

January 27, 2022 05:02PM avatar
Russo Loco Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Olaf Rasmussen Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > (Roger's) video graphically confirms my
> long-held
> > view that the new highway should have followed
> > the old road on the east side of the valley
> instead
> > of cutting away on Windy Point . . .
>
>
> I wholeheartedly Second, Third and
> Fourth that motion, Olaf -
   
> thumbs upthumbs upthumbs up
>
> The route was undoubtedly chosen to minimize
> snow-fighting efforts on the new highway (see
> [ngdiscussion.net],
> 153566), and with the assumption that the railroad
> would be gone by the time the road was paved.

My guess is you are probably right Russ.
Subject Author Posted

CTSRR 484 & 488 Double Header Attachments

Roger Hogan January 27, 2022 05:28AM

Re: CTSRR 484 & 488 Double Header Attachments

Olaf Rasmussen January 27, 2022 10:02AM

Re: C&TSRR 484 & 488 Double Header above The Gash . . .

Russo Loco January 27, 2022 01:46PM

Re: C&TSRR 484 & 488 Double Header above The Gash . . .

Roger Hogan January 27, 2022 05:02PM

Re: CTSRR 484 & 488 Double Header

Roger Hogan January 27, 2022 02:40PM

Re: CTSRR 484 & 488 Double Header

nscaler2 January 27, 2022 11:00AM

Re: CTSRR 484 & 488 Double Header

Roger Hogan January 27, 2022 05:02PM

Re: CTSRR 484 & 488 Double Header

jessica stacey January 30, 2022 12:57PM

Re: CTSRR 484 & 488 Double Header

Roger Hogan January 30, 2022 06:51PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login