Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 320? Not a drones perspective.eye rolling smiley

August 31, 2021 08:49AM
George W Pearce Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Those few spikes holding down those guard rails
> are going to have to work really hard to keep a
> locomotive from going over the edge if one ever
> derails on the bridge.

Heaven Forbid, that ever happens it's an amazing bridge, and even more amazing that all the weight of all the cars and locomotives ride on the inside of the ties, the ties doing most of the supporting of all that weight. Most RGS bridges have at least three stringers for each rail to rest on, there is nothing below the tie that the rail is resting on. It's simply an amazing work of ingenuity, and has been used for over a hundred years this way. Too bad the RGS didn't go with this design on the Ophir Loop, between the butterfly trestle and Trout Lake, would be amazing to see in action if it still was in operation.

Still a Student,

Dave
Subject Author Posted

320? Not a drones perspective.eye rolling smiley Attachments

davidtltc August 24, 2021 03:06PM

Re: 320? Not a drones perspective.eye rolling smiley

guymonmd August 24, 2021 03:36PM

From underneath

davidtltc August 25, 2021 07:59AM

Cascade Creek Viaduct Attachments

davidtltc August 27, 2021 10:12AM

Trail To Photo Oportunity Attachments

davidtltc August 27, 2021 01:49PM

Cascade Creek Viaduct skiwampus Attachments

davidtltc August 31, 2021 05:20PM

Re: Cascade Creek Viaduct skiwampus Attachments

heatermason August 31, 2021 06:30PM

Re: Cascade Creek Viaduct skiwampus

davidtltc August 31, 2021 06:43PM

Re: Cascade Creek Viaduct skiwampus

Greg Scholl August 31, 2021 08:59PM

Re: Cascade Creek Viaduct skiwampus

davidtltc August 31, 2021 09:36PM

Re: 320? Not a drones perspective.eye rolling smiley

Casey Akin August 30, 2021 10:23PM

Re: 320? Not a drones perspective.eye rolling smiley

George W Pearce August 31, 2021 08:38AM

Re: 320? Not a drones perspective.eye rolling smiley

davidtltc August 31, 2021 08:49AM

Re: 320? Not a drones perspective.eye rolling smiley

Greg Scholl August 31, 2021 11:04AM

Re: 320? Not a drones perspective.eye rolling smiley

davidtltc August 31, 2021 11:55AM

Re: 320? Not a drones perspective.eye rolling smiley

stanames August 31, 2021 02:12PM

Re: 320? Not a drones perspective.eye rolling smiley

davidtltc August 31, 2021 03:26PM

Re: 320? Not a drones perspective.eye rolling smiley

Eddy Sand August 31, 2021 02:30PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login