Re: An NGDF ex-Sperry-ment *
| April 13, 2021 04:55PM |
Russo Loco Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> drgwk37 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The top image seems sharper and more clear
> > this comparison. My humble 2 cents which is
> > only worth 2 cents!
>
> nscaler2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > There is more visible detail in the first
> photo.
>
> drgwk37 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > I agree!
>
>
> Perhaps you're right, youse guys -
>
> But the effect MAY be due to the effect of
> attacking a 3200×2400 image with the Unsharp
> Mask at 60% versus attacking a 1020×680
> image with the Unsharp Mask at 60%. And, as
> noted previously, my geezerly eyes can't see
> enough difference for it to matter — which
> is why I hereby suggest a second effort by Olaf,
> but using an image that is sharper to begin
> with. SFAIK Olaf doesn't (yet) have a copy
> of Photoshop (or Lightroom), so said second
> ex-Sperry-ment is unlikely to be corrupted by the
> use of the Unsharp Mask on either image, thus
> resulting in a more honest comparison.
I have to take it back. When looking at this post yesterday on my phone the top photo appeared to be more clear. Today sitting at my PC the bottom picture is by far more clear. Not sure if it was my phone or what? Retracting my prior comments now that I can apparently see more clearly.
William
aka drgwk37
-------------------------------------------------------
> drgwk37 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The top image seems sharper and more clear
> > this comparison. My humble 2 cents which is
> > only worth 2 cents!
>
> nscaler2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > There is more visible detail in the first
> photo.
>
> drgwk37 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > I agree!
>
>
> Perhaps you're right, youse guys -
>
> But the effect MAY be due to the effect of
> attacking a 3200×2400 image with the Unsharp
> Mask at 60% versus attacking a 1020×680
> image with the Unsharp Mask at 60%. And, as
> noted previously, my geezerly eyes can't see
> enough difference for it to matter — which
> is why I hereby suggest a second effort by Olaf,
> but using an image that is sharper to begin
> with. SFAIK Olaf doesn't (yet) have a copy
> of Photoshop (or Lightroom), so said second
> ex-Sperry-ment is unlikely to be corrupted by the
> use of the Unsharp Mask on either image, thus
> resulting in a more honest comparison.
I have to take it back. When looking at this post yesterday on my phone the top photo appeared to be more clear. Today sitting at my PC the bottom picture is by far more clear. Not sure if it was my phone or what? Retracting my prior comments now that I can apparently see more clearly.
William
aka drgwk37
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
488 stops for water at Los Pinos tank on closing day Oct. 1979. Photo courtesy Don Richter
The NGDF was started by Don Richter and is currently operated in his memory by Nathan Holmes and others. Others who have contributed to the upkeep of this board are (in no particular order): Charles McCandless, Everett Lueck, Ted Wilton, Cole Adams, James Bane, John Moellmer, Jon Bentz, Linn Moedinger, lloyd lehrer, Rod Jensen, John Craft, Steven Forney, Herb Kelsey, Bill Ramaley, Russ Sperry (El Russo Loco), Josh McNeal, John West, Jim Armstrong, Bob Bergstrom, Greg Scholl, Blake Forbes Doug van Veelen and Mark Fuller.