Russo Loco Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> nscaler2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Russo, I am just a pixel peeper. LOL
>
>
> Well, you
peeped piqued my curiosity, Tom
> -
>
> So here are two 5X enlargements of screen captures
> of the same areas of the upper display and the
> lower display. I still can't pique out any
> discernible difference
:
> [attachment 73603 671003-17-above-X5.jpg]
>
> [attachment 73604 671003-17-below-X5.jpg]
>
> I should probably go back to the original .tif
> file and make new .jpg copies without the Unsharp
> Mask for a truer comparison, but Olaf's camera in
> those days wasn't much sharper than the one I was
> carrying, so I really don't think it's worth the
> effort.* IMHO, uploading smaller files wins,
> if only because it makes life easier for our
> friends like Glenn and Olaf who don't have fast
> internet connections.
>
>
- El Abuelo Histœrico, Greengo y
> Curmudgeoño de los Locomoturas Viejos y
> Verdes,
> aka Der Grossväterlich
> DünkelOlivGrünDampfKesselMantelLiebHaben
> der
>
> * On second thought, now it's your turn,
> Olaf. Take one of your nice crisp b&w photos
> of a beautifully maintained East German or
> Czechoslovakian steam locomotive and post it both
> ways - as a 4800×3200 jpeg of around 2.4 MB
> size, and also as a 1020×680 jpeg at about
> 250K, so we can see if there's enough difference
> to worry about
. . .
The top image seems sharper and more clear this comparison. My humble 2 cents which is only worth 2 cents!
William
aka drgwk37