Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

November 30, 2020 02:22PM
In the thread entitled "D&S is getting ready for the future, shouldn't the C&TS," several posters asserted the often repeated misunderstanding that the C&TS was established for the purpose of economic development and not for the purpose of creating a living museum. This deserves to be corrected. The following is excerpted verbatim from the Interstate Compact (emphasis mine):

The state of New Mexico and the state of Colorado, desiring to provide for the joint acquisition, ownership and control of an interstate narrow gauge scenic railroad, known as the Cumbres and Toltec scenic railroad, within Rio Arriba county in New Mexico and Archuleta and Conejos counties in Colorado, to promote the public welfare by encouraging and facilitating recreation and by preserving, as a living museum for future generations, a mode of transportation that helped in the development and promotion of the territories and states, and to remove all causes of present and future controversy between them with respect thereto, and being moved by considerations of interstate comity, have agreed upon the following articles: [Followed by Articles I through V]

[law.justia.com]

The phrase, "preserving, as a living museum for future generations, a mode of transportation that helped in the development and promotion of the territories and states," makes clear the primary mission of the railroad. As with other areas of public life, facts have consequences.
Subject Author Posted

What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

Brian Shoup November 30, 2020 02:22PM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

hank November 30, 2020 03:03PM

What is correct and what is incorrect

Brian Shoup November 30, 2020 03:50PM

Re: What is correct and what is incorrect

Rich Muth November 30, 2020 04:01PM

Re: What is correct and what is incorrect

Brian Norden November 30, 2020 11:07PM

Re: What is correct and what is incorrect

hank December 01, 2020 09:35AM

Re: What is correct and what is incorrect

Johnson Barr December 01, 2020 01:25PM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

Russo Loco November 30, 2020 06:01PM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

Greg Scholl November 30, 2020 07:40PM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

Russo Loco November 30, 2020 10:45PM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

Greg Scholl December 01, 2020 02:08PM

Re: What the C&TS tenders actually looked like in the "Olden Days" Attachments

Russo Loco December 01, 2020 08:30PM

Re: What the C&TS tenders actually looked like in the "Olden Days"

Earl December 01, 2020 09:07PM

Re: What the C&TS tenders actually looked like in the "Olden Days"

Tank Smith December 02, 2020 06:55AM

Re: What the C&TS tenders actually looked like in the "Olden Days"

Russo Loco December 02, 2020 12:47PM

Re: What the C&TS tenders actually looked like in the "Olden Days"

Tank Smith December 02, 2020 02:15PM

Re: What the C&TS tenders actually looked like in the "Olden Days"

Russo Loco December 02, 2020 02:37PM

Re: What the C&TS tenders actually looked like in the "Olden Days" Attachments

Tank Smith December 03, 2020 11:56AM

[moved]

IanLK March 10, 2021 08:35PM

Re: Herald and logo licenses

Scott Gibbs December 02, 2020 07:38AM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

gregcoit December 01, 2020 08:29AM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

gregcoit December 01, 2020 08:30AM

Thanks Greg, but the research was done in 2003

Brian Shoup December 02, 2020 10:49PM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

guymonmd December 02, 2020 08:46AM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

redrob December 02, 2020 12:21PM

Landmark Status, doesn't The Silverton have that too?

hank December 03, 2020 09:28AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login