Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

More K-28 Thoughts

May 17, 2007 08:02AM
The thread on the K-28 photos got me to thinking about why the Grande sold 7 K-28 class locomotives to the government during World War II. After giving it some thought I came up with this rationalle.
Class K-28 was always listed in the Rio Grande's timetables as being PASSENGER power. Up to 1941 (or so) the breakdown was this...three locomotives assigned to Shavano service, three locomotives assigned to Chili Line service and three locomotives assigned to San Juan service (this works out to one locomotive running each way, with a third locomotive as a spare). The tenth locomotive would be usually in the shop.
By 1942, the Shavano and the Chili Line were history, making their assigned locomotives surplus. My guess is that by this time the remaining K-27's were mainly used for switching and light road duties by this time and were more suitable for this service than the K-28's were (during this period the Silverton mixed was being powered by the 375, and it (and the 463) were sufficient to handle the traffic on the Silverton branch), which made the remaining 7 K-28's surplus.
Why were 473, 476 and 478 saved? (assuming I got the numbers right...) Most likely these were the three most recently shopped engines on the property.
Anybody else out there have any comments?
Incidently, for the record, my absolute favorite shot of a K-28 is a Richard B. Jackson shot of the 475 running on the Chili Line with a train...absolutely terrific! I think this shot was published in the Chili Line book the Colorado Railroad Museum published some years ago.
Subject Author Posted

More K-28 Thoughts

Bill Daniels May 17, 2007 08:02AM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

stuart olson May 17, 2007 10:24AM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

ETSRRCo May 17, 2007 11:32AM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Wade Hall May 17, 2007 01:58PM

The "K"

Tim May 17, 2007 02:41PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Jerry Day May 21, 2007 05:13PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Mike Trent May 17, 2007 02:33PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

William Reed May 17, 2007 02:56PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Wade Hall May 17, 2007 04:58PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Greg Scholl May 17, 2007 06:02PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Bill Daniels May 17, 2007 08:39PM

They were drafted

Charlie McCandless May 17, 2007 09:11PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Mike Trent May 17, 2007 10:04PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Mike Trent May 17, 2007 10:36PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Wade Hall May 18, 2007 12:09PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Greg Scholl May 18, 2007 02:45PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Casey Akin May 18, 2007 03:55PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Greg Scholl May 19, 2007 06:46AM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Herb Kelsey May 22, 2007 10:47AM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Greg Scholl May 22, 2007 12:02PM

How about lease trades?

Charlie McCandless May 22, 2007 03:57PM

Re: How about lease trades?

Greg Scholl May 22, 2007 04:00PM

Re: How about the San Juan?

Rod Jensen May 22, 2007 04:46PM

463 overhaul?

ETSRRCo May 22, 2007 07:08PM

Re: 463 overhaul? *LINK* *PIC*

Rod Jensen May 22, 2007 08:51PM

Re: 463 overhaul?

Greg Scholl May 23, 2007 07:19AM

Re: 463 overhaul?

El Coke May 23, 2007 06:55AM

Re: How about lease trades?

Ed Stabler May 22, 2007 04:46PM

Re: How about lease trades?

Jerry Day May 23, 2007 11:49AM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Herb Kelsey May 22, 2007 07:57PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Keith Hayes May 21, 2007 07:14PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Mike Trent May 22, 2007 08:32PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

John Templeton (Chama Station Agent) May 23, 2007 08:02AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login