Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: New HQ for the D&S

November 27, 2006 11:23AM
Money not spent is money earned or retained, but in sales of land in the magnitude that the D&SNG has done, I don't think property taxes was much of a consideration. The entire railroad operation in San Juan County pays slightly more than $8000 a year in property taxes, down sharply from D&RGW days when the local taxes generated close to $25,000 a year. Property taxes in Colorado for public utilities are assessed by the state and are based on the mainline miles of track in each county divided into the total assessment, and that includes land, improvements, and equipment. Thus, the D&RGW track mileage had a much higher valuation under the D&RGW than it does under current ownership. The only thing that affects the taxes paid by the railroad on a local level is the mill levy established by the varying tax entities.
Our local assessor, Judy Zimmerman, recently told me that Charlie Bradshaw protested every valuation and tax assessment and was generally successful in driving down what he had to pay.
Subject Author Posted

New HQ for the D&S *LINK*

Bruce H. November 20, 2006 09:06AM

Re: New HQ for the D&S

Casey Akin aka: kitBASHer November 20, 2006 09:35AM

Re: New HQ for the D&S

Sammy D November 20, 2006 10:34AM

Re: New HQ for the D&S

Tom Richards November 20, 2006 10:46AM

Re: New HQ for the D&S

William Reed November 20, 2006 11:00AM

Re: New HQ for the D&S

Hobosteve November 21, 2006 03:12AM

Re: New HQ for the D&S

Chris Webster November 23, 2006 07:17PM

Re: New HQ for the D&S

douten November 24, 2006 10:06AM

Re: New HQ for the D&S

Hobosteve November 27, 2006 08:59AM

Re: New HQ for the D&S

Fritz Klinke November 27, 2006 11:23AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.