Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

A long road, but possible.

Jim Burrill
December 18, 2000 06:43PM
We could call this a tale of two 44 tonners. I think John Hammond would tell you that it is possible to put #19 into the condition of #15, but it will take a considerable amount of time and money.
I think the important thing is that one guy be made responsible for the locomotive. It should be one of the C&TS crewmen, someone who is local and sees the locomotive on a regular basis. This person will be the "point man". He may not do all the work himself, but he will oversee anyone who does work on the locomotive.
Some time ago, I wanted to spend the time to get #19 running again, but I found it to be a large job and I didn't have the know-how needed to do the job alone. John brought in George Greenbaum, a qualified diesel mechanic with experience. The problem is that George found some of the idiosyncrisies of #19 to be a bit much of a challenge. Simply stated, it just seemed like we were swimming upstream, for whatever reason. George operates and maintains a fleet of SD40-2 units for Escalante and Western, and I learned a lot from George about reversers, traction motors and diesel engines in general. I enjoyed working with George, but I would have to say that our progress was very slow.
You guys ought to try to change a traction motor on a locomotive without a reasonably heavy duty hoist or a drop table. We jacked and blocked, jacked and blocked again, then used a 2 ton hoist secured to the overhead pre-stressed concrete joists of the roof. Each time we would pull on that hoist, we would ask ourselves if we were exceeding the 2 ton limit. I'm pretty certain that the weight of that motor, combined with the associated gearbox did indeed weigh more than 2 tons.
Earl, I don't think you should feel bad about following your bosses' instructions. If you had done anything different, it would have been insubordination, something that is rarely tolerated on any railroad or business. GB did indeed tear the h*ll out of that locomotive, plowing snow, removing covers on traction motors so they were exposed to the elements and allowing it to leak diesel fuel all over the place. Those with knowledge of diesels tell me that a crankcase explosion was possible because of the fuel dillution of the oil. We were fortunate that didn't occur.
In short, C&TS needs someone like John Hammond who will take responsibility for that locomotive. I wish it could be myself, but I'm 5 hours away and as time goes on, my available time seems to shrink. It needs to be someone local who can work with it long term and with reasonable regularity.
#15 and #19 are sisters and it is possible to put them in reasonably similar condition, don't you think?
Jim Burrill
Loveland, Colorado
Subject Author Posted

A long road, but possible.

Jim Burrill December 18, 2000 06:43PM

Re: A long road, but possible.

John Hammond December 18, 2000 08:00PM

Re: A long road, but possible.

Tom Stewart December 19, 2000 09:57AM

Voodoo Mechanics .

El Coke December 19, 2000 10:07AM

Re: Voodoo Mechanics .

Tom Stewart December 19, 2000 11:01AM

Re: Voodoo Mechanics .

Earl the diesel wrecker December 19, 2000 01:22PM

Re: Voodoo Mechanics .

Tom Stewart December 19, 2000 01:51PM

Re: Voodoo Mechanics .

Dave Peterson December 19, 2000 03:05PM

I couldn't resist this one!

Greg Scholl December 19, 2000 06:31PM

Re: I couldn't resist this one!

Fred T December 19, 2000 07:37PM

Re: Voodoo Mechanics .

Ryan Scott December 19, 2000 10:13PM

Transition

Ryan Scott December 19, 2000 10:21PM

an unfortunate tale .

El Coke December 18, 2000 08:30PM

Re: Traction motor #1.

Jim Burrill December 19, 2000 11:51AM

#19, Just Whats the Problem

Charlie Irvin December 19, 2000 01:32PM

Re: #19, Just Whats the Problem

Fred T December 19, 2000 02:06PM

Re: #19, Just Whats the Problem

Charlie Irvin December 19, 2000 02:48PM

Re: #19, Just Whats the Problem

Jim Burrill December 19, 2000 03:23PM

Re: #19, Just Whats the Problem

John Hammond December 19, 2000 07:39PM

Re: #19, Just Whats the Problem

G. W. Laepple December 21, 2000 10:14AM

A More Optimistic View

John West December 21, 2000 10:53AM

Re: A More Optimistic View

John Hammond December 21, 2000 08:19PM

Field shunting?

Boris Serena December 22, 2000 12:35AM

Re: Field shunting? - why bother.

Earl Knoob December 22, 2000 07:30AM

Re: Field shunting? - why bother.

Boris Serena December 22, 2000 07:51AM

Re: Field shunting? - why bother.

John Hammond December 22, 2000 08:42PM

Re: #19, Just Whats the Problem

ted Miles December 21, 2000 11:06AM

Re: #19, Just Whats the Problem

Jim Burrill December 23, 2000 11:12AM

Re: #19, Just Whats the Problem

J. B. Bane December 23, 2000 02:19PM

Re: #19, Just Whats the Problem

G. W. Laepple December 23, 2000 07:00PM

Re: #19, Just Whats the Problem

Boomer December 24, 2000 04:31PM

Re: #19, Just Whats the Problem

Earl Knoob December 23, 2000 07:22PM

Re: #19, Just Whats the Problem

John Hammond December 23, 2000 08:44PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.