Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Why the move?

September 11, 2004 06:56AM
Paul,
The Auxiliary tenders are converted UP 20,000 gallon tenders. These were convered by removing the oil bunker and closing up the coal space (what was left when the bunker was removed). The coal space was then opened and the ends of the tenders canted.
Their capacity was raised to 25,000 gallons. These tanks were insulated and sheathed in Sheet Metal (thus the smooth sides). The two tanks that the UP Steam Program currently used in Excursion Service were formerly used as fuel oil storage tanks in Los Angeles. There were three of them that made it to Cheyenne. Two were used for service, one for parts. The parts tank is all ready missing one truck due to some castings that broke on a truck when we were on an excursion. We had to set out one of the tenders at the time.
Another cylindrical tank was obtained from LA but it ended up in Ogden behind the Blow Hulk that they have on display there.
FYI: UP did not view their tenders as part of the locomotives. In looking through their engineering drawings, it is quite apparent that each tank was numbered individually and treated as a separate piece of rolling stock, even though it was coupled permanantly to a locomotive. So the Tenders that you are talking about might have been freely changed between the FEF-1's and the CSA 1 & 2's (te little Challengers). The parts certainly were.
Rick
Subject Author Posted

Rolling Locomotives

South Park September 08, 2004 08:14AM

Re: Rolling Locomotives *LINK*

Bob Yarger September 08, 2004 10:26AM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Pat September 08, 2004 10:57AM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

South Park September 09, 2004 12:46AM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Rick Steele September 09, 2004 12:59AM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Charlie Mutschler September 09, 2004 07:09AM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Glen Brewer September 09, 2004 07:50AM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Rick Steele September 10, 2004 08:23AM

Rolling Locomotives ATSF2921

Pat September 09, 2004 10:36AM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Kevin Bush September 08, 2004 04:04PM

Why the move?

Robert September 09, 2004 08:10AM

Re: Why the move?

Kevin Bush September 09, 2004 02:40PM

Re: Why the move?

John Blake September 10, 2004 01:30PM

Re: Why the move?

Rick Steele September 10, 2004 01:52PM

Re: Why the move?

Kevin Bush September 10, 2004 02:35PM

Re: Why the move?

Wooly September 10, 2004 03:26PM

Re: Why the move?

Paul Hagglund September 10, 2004 05:24PM

Re: Why the move?

Rick Steele September 11, 2004 06:56AM

Re: Why the move?

Wooly September 10, 2004 03:30PM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Wooly September 09, 2004 12:35PM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Kevin Bush September 09, 2004 02:48PM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Wooly September 09, 2004 04:20PM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Kevin Bush September 09, 2004 04:38PM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Wooly September 09, 2004 05:58PM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Kevin Bush September 09, 2004 06:21PM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Don Richter September 09, 2004 08:37AM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Darel Crawford September 09, 2004 08:56AM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Herb Kelsey September 09, 2004 11:52AM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Skip Luke September 09, 2004 10:03AM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

South Park September 09, 2004 10:00PM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Jerry Huck September 09, 2004 10:58PM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

South Park September 10, 2004 08:23AM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

Paul Hagglund September 10, 2004 05:32PM

Re: Rolling Locomotives

dan September 10, 2004 06:12PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.