Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

C&TS 5-year plan

September 08, 2004 02:20AM
It sounds very exciting.
I like the development of on-line gravel pit(s) for ballast.
As far as locomotives:
2004 484, 487, 488
2005 489, 483 (483 if funding is available)
2006 492, 497
2007 463 (sooner if private funding is available)
2008 494, 495 (maybe)
I like it because in the next 5 years (hopefully everything will go as planned) all locos will be examined if not returned to service. I personally would like to see all 10 locos servicable but the plan shoots for 6 with a tentative goal of 8 if funding is available. Two "new" locomotives are to be investigated for operation - 483 and 492.
There are plans to have enough steel cars that the box car coaches may be retired.
It looks loke the idea is to have at least one 6500 series flat car for MOW duty (PHASE 1). PHASE 2 wants four.
The issue of the dead spot for radio in the middle of the line (Osier) is interesting. I wonder if anyonme suggested using the old telephone pole line for communications to Osier (maybe VOIP <img class=" />
If the training center (Center for Locomotive Excellence) comes to full force, Maybe 494 and 495 would be used as training locos to start with and as parts get built, maybe they are returned to operation.
The goal to raise the speed limit (due to upgrading the roadbed and track structure) to 20MPH is good. As is the goal for more varied trip options.
If most of this comes about, then the C&TS will be a world class operation/museum.
Doug
Subject Author Posted

C&TS 5-year plan

Douglas vV September 08, 2004 02:20AM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan

Kevin Bush September 08, 2004 01:59PM

Re: Or should I meant to say......thinking. *NM*

Kevin Bush September 08, 2004 04:05PM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan

Paul Hagglund September 08, 2004 10:41PM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan

Cdaspit September 09, 2004 06:02AM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan

Frank Stapleton September 11, 2004 10:37PM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan

Kevin Bush September 12, 2004 12:23AM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan--passenger car problem

Andy Roth September 09, 2004 08:13AM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan--passenger car problem

Gary Waite September 09, 2004 09:58AM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan--passenger car problem

Ted Miles September 09, 2004 10:13AM

Protecting rebuilt cars from the elements

Dan Robirds September 09, 2004 11:57AM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan--passenger car problem

Andy Roth September 09, 2004 01:00PM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan--passenger car problem

John Sporseen September 09, 2004 06:43PM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan--passenger car problem

Brian Norden September 09, 2004 07:33PM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

Andy Roth September 10, 2004 01:26PM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

John Sporseen September 10, 2004 08:24PM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

Yosemite Sam September 10, 2004 10:25PM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

andt roth September 10, 2004 10:28PM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

John Sporseen September 11, 2004 09:41AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

John Sporseen September 11, 2004 12:19PM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

Jeff Chittick September 11, 2004 04:43PM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

Stevo del Applegato September 12, 2004 07:08AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

John Sporseen September 12, 2004 08:32AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

John Sporseen September 12, 2004 08:33AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

SZuiderveen September 12, 2004 08:58AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

Ed Stabler September 12, 2004 10:40AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

Paul Hagglund September 12, 2004 10:36PM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

John Sporseen September 12, 2004 11:32PM

Roller bearings

Douglas vV September 13, 2004 12:22AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks *LINK*

John Sporseen September 13, 2004 12:16AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

John Sporseen September 13, 2004 09:15AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

Jeff A. September 13, 2004 01:22PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.