Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&TSRR=Back Together=Double Header.

October 04, 2019 07:56PM avatar
We found that when using a plow-equipped engine as the road engine on a doubleheader, if you stopped the train with the road engine's nose just off the end of the bridge (about 30 back of where 488 stopped), it was a lot easier to get the engines to recouple. The long shank coupler sticking out over the end of the plow, made the offset between the couplers a pain. Add to that there is a significant vertical curve in the track right off the end of the trestle makes things tricky. I've seen perfectly lined up couplers fail to mate because the tender coupler on the helper is twisted up on the grade, while the road engine is on the flat.
Subject Author Posted

C&TSRR=Back Together=Double Header. Attachments

Roger Hogan September 22, 2019 09:20AM

Re: C&TSRR=Back Together=Double Header.

Brian Norden September 22, 2019 04:32PM

Re: C&TSRR=Back Together=Double Header.

Roger Hogan September 22, 2019 06:38PM

Re: C&TSRR=Back Together=Double Header.

Casey Akin September 22, 2019 10:45PM

Re: C&TSRR=Back Together=Double Header.

Roger Hogan September 23, 2019 06:25AM

Re: C&TSRR=Back Together=Double Header.

Greg Scholl September 23, 2019 03:19PM

Re: C&TSRR=Back Together=Double Header.

Roger Hogan September 23, 2019 03:56PM

Re: C&TSRR=Back Together=Double Header.

drgwk37 September 24, 2019 05:12AM

Re: C&TSRR=Back Together=Double Header.

Roger Hogan September 24, 2019 06:41AM

Re: C&TSRR=Back Together=Double Header.

Earl October 04, 2019 07:56PM

Re: C&TSRR=Back Together=Double Header.

Roger Hogan October 07, 2019 06:42PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login