Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

November 13, 2019 01:33PM avatar
I thought the car was from the RGS, I have no idea if it was or not but its definitely narrow gauge.

also, this isn't a discussion about 497 operations, we have had plenty of threads about that already winking smiley



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 11/13/2019 01:35PM by Joe Weigman.
Subject Author Posted

Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Greg Scholl September 20, 2019 10:51AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

evankamp September 20, 2019 11:01AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Mike Stillwell September 20, 2019 11:15AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

evankamp September 20, 2019 11:17AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Mike Stillwell September 20, 2019 11:20AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

drgwk37 September 20, 2019 11:27AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

evankamp September 20, 2019 11:44AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

drgwk37 September 20, 2019 11:48AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

evankamp September 20, 2019 11:53AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Joe Weigman September 20, 2019 12:03PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

cdaspit September 20, 2019 02:36PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483 Attachments

Jerry474 September 20, 2019 03:03PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Greg Scholl September 20, 2019 03:09PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483 Attachments

Joe Weigman September 22, 2019 12:04PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

drgwk37 September 22, 2019 04:24PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Kevin Cook November 12, 2019 02:26PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Will Gant September 25, 2019 09:22AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

HRB November 12, 2019 02:10PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Sean Jackson November 12, 2019 05:17PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

jonaths November 12, 2019 06:19PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Carl T. Henderson November 12, 2019 09:07PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Dirk Ramsey November 12, 2019 09:11PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Joe Weigman November 13, 2019 01:33PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Earl September 22, 2019 08:42AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

drgwk37 September 22, 2019 04:22PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Rob483 September 24, 2019 08:08PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Ryan Morris September 24, 2019 08:32PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483 Attachments

Jerry474 September 20, 2019 12:31PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Rick Steele September 20, 2019 01:07PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Greg Scholl September 20, 2019 01:13PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Jerry474 September 20, 2019 01:17PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

guymonmd September 20, 2019 01:19PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

evankamp September 20, 2019 01:24PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

cdaspit September 20, 2019 02:42PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login