Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

November 09, 2018 06:41PM
DakotaRed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> drgwk37 Wrote:
>
>
> > The priest flanges once installed were
> permanent
> > and didn't come off.
>
> Oh, I need to reword my question. "Did they
> add/remove PARTS of the flangers in concert
> with the plows?"
>
> If you look at the photo in my original post, the
> linkage has been removed from the deck lever to
> the flanger blades.
>
> I didn't mean to imply the cylinders, etc were
> removed. My apologies.

No, they could still use the priest flanger along with a plow that was mounted on a locomotive. They served two different purposes when removing snow/ice from the rails.

William
aka drgwk37
Subject Author Posted

Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives? Attachments

DakotaRed November 08, 2018 07:16PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

drgwk37 November 08, 2018 08:05PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

DakotaRed November 09, 2018 03:58PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

drgwk37 November 09, 2018 06:41PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

Kelly Anderson November 08, 2018 08:14PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

TonyK375 November 08, 2018 10:09PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

TonyK375 November 08, 2018 10:27PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

daveyb November 09, 2018 01:13PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

daveyb November 09, 2018 01:13PM

Flanger illustrations Attachments

DakotaRed November 09, 2018 03:39PM

Re: Plows and flangers: considered a 'set' on locomotives?

DakotaRed November 09, 2018 03:49PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login