> > Wayne Hoskin Wrote:
>
> > > But, but, but, wouldn't a true Phraudy-Graph
> > > be one that sets to be Phraudish and fool any
> > > photo looker to think he is lookin' at the
> genu-
> > > ine article from old??
> > > Whereas this one is a beautifully set photo
> in
> > > which some lucky young whipper snapper of
> > > a modern era happened to be on the footplate,
>
> > > and thus, by definition, not be a
> Phraudy-Graph?
> > > Or am over-thinking again! [?]
> > >
> > > Wayne from Oz,
> > >
> > > PS I actually didn't notice the lad in
> my initial
> > > admiration, till Wiley Willie mentioned him!
>
> Stewart Rhine Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > Thanks Wayne, It just goes to show ya that
> > Willie is a trouble maker.
>
>
> But
. . . but
. . .
> Wayne & Stewart -
>
> Ah din't notice him neither 'til I looked real
> close the second or third time – thet's when
> Ah done edited m' post 'n' added the asterisk and
> comment below m' signy-chur. It shore had me
> fooled 'til Ah looked reel close!!
Well, it is nice to know that youz guyz are noticing things ... it tells me that someone is actually lookin at the photos.