Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: In for the long haul

November 20, 2017 07:21AM
Greg Scholl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Also maybe weight restrictions on some bridges
> perhaps??? Although I doubt these water cars weigh
> more than other loaded freight.
> Greg
>
Easy enough to figure out if you want to stress your calculator. Just remember: "A pint's a pound the world around." So a gallon of water weighs 8 pounds and 2,500 gallons (C-16/19 tenders) would be 20,000 lbs. Or, if you prefer, 10 tons.
hank
Subject Author Posted

In for the long haul Attachments

davidtltc November 17, 2017 04:01PM

Re: In for the long haul

drgwk37 November 17, 2017 04:27PM

Re: In for the long haul

Ted miles November 17, 2017 06:11PM

Re: In for the long haul

Earl November 17, 2017 08:06PM

Re: In for the long haul

Chris Walker November 17, 2017 10:40PM

Re: In for the long haul

John K November 18, 2017 11:35AM

Re: In for the long haul

Chris Walker November 18, 2017 11:59AM

Re: In for the long haul

John K November 18, 2017 03:28PM

Re: In for the long haul

John K November 18, 2017 03:29PM

Re: In for the long haul

drgwk37 November 18, 2017 07:24AM

Re: In for the long haul

pd3463 November 18, 2017 07:58AM

Re: In for the long haul

drgwk37 November 18, 2017 08:10AM

Re: In for the long haul

davidtltc November 18, 2017 10:38AM

Re: In for the long haul

Chris Walker November 18, 2017 11:56AM

Re: #315 in it for the long haul?

Johnson Barr November 18, 2017 07:52PM

Re: In for the long haul

Jimmy Blouch November 18, 2017 04:49PM

Re: In for the long haul

Dirk Ramsey November 18, 2017 06:37PM

Re: In for the long haul

Jimmy Blouch November 18, 2017 09:48PM

Re: In for the long haul

Greg Scholl November 19, 2017 06:59AM

Re: In for the long haul

hank November 20, 2017 07:21AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login