November 18, 2017 09:10AM
pd3463 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When the old tenders were put into auxiliary
> service, was the coal bunker given a tank too or
> was that area left alone and open? I do realize
> the intended service may also make a difference so
> specifically I am thinking of as shown in the
> above picture?
>
> Phil

The coal bunker was left as is, at times these water cars were used on work train details and would double as water/coal supply for the MOW crews.

William
aka drgwk37
Subject Author Posted

In for the long haul Attachments

davidtltc November 17, 2017 05:01PM

Re: In for the long haul

drgwk37 November 17, 2017 05:27PM

Re: In for the long haul

Ted miles November 17, 2017 07:11PM

Re: In for the long haul

Earl November 17, 2017 09:06PM

Re: In for the long haul

Chris Walker November 17, 2017 11:40PM

Re: In for the long haul

John K November 18, 2017 12:35PM

Re: In for the long haul

Chris Walker November 18, 2017 12:59PM

Re: In for the long haul

John K November 18, 2017 04:28PM

Re: In for the long haul

John K November 18, 2017 04:29PM

Re: In for the long haul

drgwk37 November 18, 2017 08:24AM

Re: In for the long haul

pd3463 November 18, 2017 08:58AM

Re: In for the long haul

drgwk37 November 18, 2017 09:10AM

Re: In for the long haul

davidtltc November 18, 2017 11:38AM

Re: In for the long haul

Chris Walker November 18, 2017 12:56PM

Re: #315 in it for the long haul?

Johnson Barr November 18, 2017 08:52PM

Re: In for the long haul

Jimmy Blouch November 18, 2017 05:49PM

Re: In for the long haul

Dirk Ramsey November 18, 2017 07:37PM

Re: In for the long haul

Jimmy Blouch November 18, 2017 10:48PM

Re: In for the long haul

Greg Scholl November 19, 2017 07:59AM

Re: In for the long haul

hank November 20, 2017 08:21AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login