Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

October 31, 2017 07:59AM
In Earl's post about the photo currently at the bottom of the page, he mentions 483's retirement was forced.

Given the fact it has never been returned to operation in 40 years, it had to be a serious problem. The reason being I have never come across anywhere.

Could someone please elaborate why the 483 was retired?

Boiler issues? Broken frame?
Subject Author Posted

Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

kcsivils October 31, 2017 07:59AM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

hank October 31, 2017 09:04AM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Kelly Anderson October 31, 2017 09:06AM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Greg Vigil October 31, 2017 05:22PM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Clyde Putman October 31, 2017 07:02PM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Johnson Barr October 31, 2017 07:22PM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Russ489 October 31, 2017 07:11PM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Earl November 01, 2017 12:35AM

Re:#483 In Service Attachments

LOGGERHOGGER November 01, 2017 04:40AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service Attachments

Chris Walker November 01, 2017 05:39AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service

Wayne Hoskin November 01, 2017 05:39AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service

Greg Scholl November 01, 2017 07:30AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service

tomc November 01, 2017 09:52AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service

Ross Miller November 01, 2017 07:17PM

Re: Re:#483 In Service

tomc November 02, 2017 08:50AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service at Maysville

Chris Walker November 02, 2017 04:05PM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Earl November 03, 2017 02:41PM

Monarch Branch Standard gauging

hank November 03, 2017 06:41PM

Re: Monarch Branch speculations, etc.

Russo Loco November 03, 2017 07:29PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login