Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T

April 14, 2017 08:28PM
It is interesting to note the weights given--29900 for both weight on drivers and total weight (builder's weight on drivers 24,000 pounds for c/n 461 so maybe not same engine.) One could infer from this that the 296 was an 0-6-0 at the time this list was compiled, which would be consistent with calling it a "6 wheel" engine.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 04/15/2017 02:55PM by GeorgeGaskill.
Subject Author Posted

Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T

donstrack April 14, 2017 12:19PM

Re: Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T

Eugene Blabey April 14, 2017 02:40PM

Re: Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T

Tom Moungovan April 14, 2017 03:05PM

Re: Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T

philip.marshall April 14, 2017 02:44PM

Re: Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T Attachments

bcp April 14, 2017 04:47PM

Re: Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T

Russo Loco April 15, 2017 01:03PM

Re: Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T

bcp April 15, 2017 02:24PM

Re: Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T

santafe158 April 18, 2017 02:25PM

Re: Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T

philip.marshall April 18, 2017 05:09PM

Re: Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T Attachments

donstrack April 14, 2017 07:43PM

Re: Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T

Todd Hackett April 14, 2017 07:58PM

Re: Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T

philip.marshall April 14, 2017 08:09PM

Re: Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T

GeorgeGaskill April 14, 2017 08:28PM

Re: Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T

cochoochoo April 18, 2017 12:42PM

Re: Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T

Brian Norden April 14, 2017 08:23PM

Re: Mason 461, 0-4-4T or 0-4-2T

Brian Norden April 15, 2017 01:29PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login