Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 493 and the Loop

November 12, 2016 06:05PM
When I made the original statement saying that the 491 would not be running at the loop, I thought the original poster was implying some sort of operating lease from the railroad museum. I wasn't aware that the Grande gave the loop project first "dibs" on the locomotive. My mistake.
Subject Author Posted

493 and the Loop

CharlieMcCandless October 31, 2016 01:36PM

Re: 493 and the Loop

Chris Walker October 31, 2016 02:57PM

Re: 493 and the Loop

rehunn November 01, 2016 04:16PM

Re: 493 and the Loop

jalbers November 01, 2016 04:20PM

493 and loops

dougvv November 01, 2016 05:01PM

The cut by the fill

CharlieMcCandless November 01, 2016 05:04PM

Re: The cut by the fill

Will Gant November 01, 2016 05:19PM

Re: K-36's vs The Cut by the Fill, and the Pin Truss Bridge . . .

Johnson Barr November 01, 2016 05:59PM

Re: The cut by the fill

Tim Bain November 01, 2016 08:56PM

Re: 493 and the Loop

vulturenest November 01, 2016 05:25PM

Re: 493 and the Loop

Hauspiper November 09, 2016 08:04PM

Re: Hauspiper = Dudelsacher? Music

Johnson Barr November 09, 2016 10:25PM

Re: Hauspiper = Dudelsacher? Music

dougvv November 10, 2016 03:35AM

Re: Hauspiper = Dudelsacher? Music

Hauspiper November 10, 2016 06:55AM

Re: 493 and the Loop

jim pallow November 01, 2016 05:23PM

Re: 493 and the Loop

Carl T. Henderson November 08, 2016 12:36PM

Re: 493 and the Loop

jalbers November 08, 2016 12:37PM

Re: 493 and the Loop

Jason Midyette November 08, 2016 01:05PM

Re: 493 and the Loop

Carl T. Henderson November 09, 2016 06:55PM

Re: 493 and the Loop

jalbers November 10, 2016 08:22AM

Re: 493 and the Loop

Carl T. Henderson November 12, 2016 06:05PM

Re: 493 and the Loop

jim pallow November 08, 2016 01:49PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login