Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

September 28, 2016 01:43AM
That Tabasco was simply to add spice to the photo...

The part I find confusing is that the plans I have, from Sloan's book, also shows the blade as being 8' wide.

If you look at this photo on the Friends site:

[ngtrainpics.photoshelter.com]

It appears as if the plow was at least 9 feet wide, perhaps slightly wider, using the track gauge as a measuring tool. Looking at other photos in that series, there seems to be quite a bit of overhang beyond the sides of the gon. Not sure if that gon is the same width as a standard 5 board high side, but I don't see anything in Sloan's to indicate it isn't. I haven't been able to find any pics of the interior of the gon from the perspective of the underside of the plow...

I'm guessing from the large bolts near the top/rear that thee must have been some kind of internal cross bracing, at least in the photos taken in 1949.

These bolts seem to have "disappeared" from the photos taken in 1954. Is there a possibility the plow was replaced? I understand that it was actually a locomotive plow they used, were there maybe more than one of them?

Also, was the car ever painted in MOW grey or did it live out it's life in freight car brown?

Too bad this wasn't one of the pieces of equipment that was preserved...

Thanks, Robert



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 09/28/2016 01:49AM by rdamurphy.
Subject Author Posted

Gunnison Plow 09271 Attachments

rdamurphy September 27, 2016 07:39PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

John West September 27, 2016 09:45PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271 *Hijack

Casey Akin September 27, 2016 10:04PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271 *Hijack

dougvv September 27, 2016 10:34PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271 *Hijack

John Liebson February 10, 2018 09:12AM

Re: Hijack (weathering models) continued . . . drinking smiley

Russo Loco September 28, 2016 12:29PM

Both fall short of the new standard set by...

Brian Shoup October 19, 2016 04:30PM

: Both fall short of the new standard set by...

Dirk Ramsey October 19, 2016 10:44PM

Re: All fall short of the old standard set by Vera . . . sad smiley

Johnson Barr October 19, 2016 11:58PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

wishiwasincolorado September 28, 2016 01:10AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

John Liebson October 19, 2016 06:27AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

Casey Akin September 27, 2016 11:03PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

Chris Walker September 28, 2016 04:07AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy September 28, 2016 01:43AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

John K September 28, 2016 05:53AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

Chris Walker September 28, 2016 06:37AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy September 28, 2016 03:03PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy October 18, 2016 09:26PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy September 28, 2016 04:59AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy September 28, 2016 06:36AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy October 18, 2016 09:25PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

Chris Walker October 19, 2016 12:12AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy October 19, 2016 05:00AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

Chris Walker October 19, 2016 06:15AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271 Attachments

davegrandt October 19, 2016 09:52AM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy October 19, 2016 05:42PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

jim pallow October 19, 2016 03:11PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

Chris Walker October 19, 2016 03:22PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

jim pallow October 20, 2016 04:21PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy October 19, 2016 03:35PM

Re: Gunnison Plow 09271

rdamurphy October 20, 2016 07:30PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login