Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Capitol Projects

March 31, 2012 12:04PM
Getting back to the original discussion......why couldn't additional buildings be constructed in a historically sympathetic style. The ongoing operational needs of the railroad shouldn't be completely dismissed because something isn't historically 'correct'. The ballon loop in Antonito isn't historically correct and neither is the proposed loop in Chama. However, both are needed in order to improve operations. The loop at Osier is the same. A new carbarn could be modern all metal construction and skinned in wood to provide a nod history. I've seen this done elsewhere and it seems to maintain the historic fabric while addressing operational needs.

I know - I'm naive.
Subject Author Posted

Capital Projects

Greg Scholl March 30, 2012 07:47PM

Re: Capitol Projects

RichB March 30, 2012 11:08PM

Re: Capitol Projects

John Liebson March 31, 2012 10:33AM

Re: Capitol Projects

rehunn March 31, 2012 10:38AM

Re: Capitol Projects

Jon Bentz March 31, 2012 12:04PM

Re: Capitol Projects

Greg Scholl March 31, 2012 10:19PM

Re: Capital Projects

Bill Pratt April 01, 2012 11:57AM

Re: Capital Projects

Greg Scholl April 01, 2012 01:56PM

Re: Capital Projects Attachments

Jeff Ramsey April 02, 2012 02:05AM

Re: Capital Projects

NGJunkie April 02, 2012 06:10PM

Re: Capital Projects

Fritz Klinke April 03, 2012 03:02AM

Re: Capital Projects

John Cole April 03, 2012 07:28AM

Re: Capital Projects

Jeff Ramsey April 03, 2012 08:24PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login