Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: The Wreck at MP 309.35

April 02, 2000 07:02PM
Why in god's name would anyone want to take the pilot which has been undisturbed for 77 years and which is bent and move it anywhere. The 169 has a pilot and if a new one was needed it would be cheaper to build a new one than to repair the one at MP 309.3. The place it rests now will be poorer for its loss and the place it goes will be poorer for its arrival.
Subject Author Posted

The Wreck at MP 309.35

Don Richter April 02, 2000 12:26PM

Re: The Wreck at MP 309.35

Chile John Pritchard April 02, 2000 06:51PM

Re: The Wreck at MP 309.35

John Bush April 02, 2000 07:02PM

Re: The Wreck at MP 309.35

Chile John Pritchard April 02, 2000 07:16PM

Re: The Wreck at MP 309.35

tim olson April 02, 2000 09:13PM

Re: The Wreck at MP 309.35

Richard "Bo" Boulware April 02, 2000 09:39PM

Re: The Wreck at MP 309.35

Don Richter April 03, 2000 10:51AM

Re: The Wreck at MP 309.35

Dave Peterson April 04, 2000 09:35AM

Windy Point wreck

Rich Muth April 04, 2000 01:52PM

Re: Windy Point wreck

Dave Peterson April 04, 2000 02:31PM

Re: The Wreck at MP 309.35

Earl April 06, 2000 05:00PM

The other engine was the 411(later 342)

Grant Houston April 02, 2000 09:44PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.