Narrow Gauge Discussion :  Narrow Gauge Railroad Discussion Forum The fastest message board... ever.

Narrow Gauge Railroad Discussion Forum

This is a forum for the discussion of narrow gauge and steam railroading with a primary emphasis on railroads operating in the US. While discussions of modeling are welcome, please try to limit such discussions to issues relating to the prototype. This forum is not associated with any organization or group, and the authors of each post are solely responsible for the content of their post.

The forum is open to anyone to read, however if you wish to participate, you will have to register, and to provide a valid e-mail address. When you do so, you will be sent a confirmation e-mail with a link which you can use to activate your account. You are free to use a handle as your screen name should you wish to do so, however we do ask that you provide a real name in the profile associated with your handle. Beyond that all we ask is that you accord yourself as if you were visiting a friend's house, or roundhouse. Remember, you are responsible for anything you say.

Rights to all posts are owned by their respective authors. All other content copyright 2001- 2010 NGDF, all rights reserved.

This board is owned and operated by Don Richter. Others who have contributed to the upkeep of this board are (in no particular order): Herb Kelsey, Everett Lueck, Bill Ramaley, Rod Jensen, Russ Sperry (El Russo Loco), Josh McNeal, John West, Jim Armstrong, Bob Bergstrom, Greg Scholl, Blake Forbes, and Doug van Veelen.  
Re: C&S 9 status
Posted by: locoboilerguy (IP Logged)
Date: July 01, 2009 12:19PM

Okay guys,

I swore I would never post again. The contract has not been changed on the #9 other than there are issues with the preparation for the site for the engine. I wish I knew of a change in the contract as it would of saved a lot of work, time and money. In many cases we are doing far more than the contract called for.

The engine was to be made serviceable for Breckenridge. At the time of the contract we knew the boiler had major issues. There was no way the FRA would ever accept it unless somebody was willing to really lie about it. The external corrosion should of not allowed it to go back into service for 2006. The state condemned it after 2006. We spent a great deal of time and effort getting a variance to operate her at 145 psi from the state. That variance was granted. With annual inspections she can keep that pressure for a long time to come.

The next issue which is a deal breaker is the cracks in the cylinder area below the saddle which cracks wrap all the way under the cylinder center section. Not only are there old cracks which an attempt was made to repair then there are new cracks starting. This is something that should of shown up in 2006 had somebody actually taken the time to clean the old girl. These cracks are deal breakers. She will never run in her current state except under a very minimal load. Otherwise its only a matter of time before the cylinders become a kit.

Now as far as the work we have done. New crown brasses, reworked the boxes, replaced some hub liners, turned journals, turned tires, new shoes and wedges, cylinder bore work, new pistons, new piston rods, new packing, slide valve work, the above boiler work, throttle work(it leaked like a rusty bucket)branch pipe work(they leaked like the same bucket), all new gaskets for these parts, crosshead work, rebuild lead truck, new lead truck wheels, new hub liners, renew lead truck journals, babbit and cut the lead truck brasses, lead truck box work, swing link work on lead truck, rebuild brake cylinders, some spring work, brake pins and bushings, made the rods brite, new rod bearings and bushings and we are working on the valve gear right now.

The whole engine has been sandblasted and is painted with both imron primer and high gloss black inron, the cab is being refinished with quality paint as the roof was already coming off from the weather along with the paint peeling.

We still have jacket paint to do and the piping. We have spent $10,000 just on air compressors and sand. One employee spent a month making the rods look good. Its going on its wheels in a couple of days.

The running gear will be very sound, the brakes sound, the springs sound, the boiler so so because of its overall condition, the valve gear decent. Cosmetically she has the best paint money can buy and the prep work has been the best possible. Sandblast to clean metal.

John Braun



Subject Written By Posted
  C&S 9 status KoloradoKid 06/30/2009 04:02PM
  Re: C&S 9 status jalbers 06/30/2009 04:05PM
  Re: C&S 9 status FordCVP71 06/30/2009 04:08PM
  Re: C&S 9 status southparkline1 06/30/2009 04:29PM
  Re: C&S 9 status FordCVP71 06/30/2009 04:56PM
  Re: C&S 9 status southparkline1 06/30/2009 05:45PM
  Re: C&S 9 status Jason Midyette 06/30/2009 06:03PM
  Re: C&S 9 status southparkline1 06/30/2009 06:16PM
  Re: C&S 9 status Dan Robirds 06/30/2009 06:38PM
  Re: C&S 9 tender status Russo Loco 06/30/2009 08:58PM
  Re: C&S 9 tender status Tim Schreiner 06/30/2009 09:28PM
  Re: C&S 9 status jasonsobczynski 07/01/2009 11:02AM
  Re: C&S 9 status FordCVP71 07/01/2009 11:11AM
  Re: C&S 9 status locoboilerguy 07/01/2009 12:19PM
  Re: C&S 9 status FordCVP71 07/01/2009 12:29PM
  Re: C&S 9 status mransr 07/01/2009 08:25PM
  Re: C&S 9 status gbrewer 07/01/2009 01:46PM
  Re: C&S 9 status Russo Loco 07/01/2009 03:46PM
  Re: C&S 9 status KoloradoKid 07/01/2009 03:54PM
  Re: C&S 9 status southparkline1 07/01/2009 04:24PM
  Re: C&S 9 status locoboilerguy 07/01/2009 04:29PM
  Re: C&S 9 status Skip 07/02/2009 06:03PM
  Re: C&S 9 status southparkline1 07/02/2009 06:09PM
  Re: C&S 9 status Jason Midyette 07/01/2009 04:25PM
  Re: C&S 9 status Russo Loco 07/01/2009 04:51PM
  Re: C&S 9 status gbrewer 07/01/2009 05:45PM
  Re: C&S 9 status Donald Foster 07/01/2009 06:54PM
  Re: C&S 9 status Rick Steele 07/01/2009 06:57PM
  Re: C&S 9 status - OUCH! Russo Loco 07/01/2009 08:46PM
  Re: C&S 9 status - OUCH! southparkline1 07/01/2009 09:19PM
  Re: C&S 9 status - OUCH! Rick Steele 07/02/2009 08:13AM
  Re: C&S 9 status Jason Midyette 07/01/2009 04:16PM
  Re: C&S 9 status Samart 07/01/2009 05:36PM
  Re: C&S 9 status southparkline1 07/01/2009 06:10PM
  Re: C&S 9 status locoboilerguy 07/02/2009 12:01PM
  Re: C&S 9 status chris king 07/02/2009 02:11PM
  C&S 9, some different questions Steve G. 07/02/2009 03:04PM
  Re: C&S 9, some different questions locoboilerguy 07/02/2009 04:04PM
  Re: C&S 9, some different questions KoloradoKid 07/03/2009 12:44PM
  Re: C&S 9 status jasonsobczynski 07/04/2009 12:19AM
  Thank you Festus 07/15/2009 12:18PM
  Re: C&S 9 status KoloradoKid 07/10/2009 04:24PM
  Re: C&S 9 status locoboilerguy 07/15/2009 09:02AM
  Re: C&S 9 status KoloradoKid 07/20/2009 09:30PM
  Re: C&S 9 status locoboilerguy 07/22/2009 03:58PM
  Re: C&S 9 status KoloradoKid 07/22/2009 04:11PM
  Re: C&S 9 status KoloradoKid 07/22/2009 09:04PM
  Re: C&S 9 status Tim Schreiner 07/22/2009 09:07PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Montezuma Lumber Co. engine number 271 with 7 cars. Photographed at McPhee, Colo., June 18, 1942.

Photo courtesy of the Denver Public Library Western History Collection catalog number OP-13259.

This forum powered by Phorum.