Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: RGS #20 frame

February 27, 2009 07:58PM
Daniel Wrote:

1. I am curious why BNSF would insert a diesel on a train hauled by the 3751 or the 4449. How about the 261? They have no vested interest in protecting the brakes on these cars in the trains that they are hauling that are owned by other parties. I suppose you could make an argument that the diesel would provide additional braking but I would suspect that in most cases the diesel is there to protect the train from the steamer experiencing a menchanical failure.

2. I am also surprised that there is absolutely no concern at UP about a steam only hauled train experiencing a major failure on their very busy mainlines with no steam servicing facilities in close proximity. With two steamers on the train in 2005 there were no diesels. When one steamer failed they went to the diesel standbys from the closest place they could get them. If the diesels are only for braking, why didn't they have them on the doubleheader prior to the failure of the 3985?

--------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Daniel, the BNSF is not the UP and I have never dealt with the BNSF, as for their diesels with Steam Locomotives, not only do I not know, I really don't care. The Railroad belongs to the BNSF and they have the perfect right to do with it what they wish. Just be greatful that they let Steam out occasionally and don't bitch about the diesels.

2. I'm sure that there is concern for a Steam only failure, but with the traffic that the DP was experiencing when the pin on the 3985 went bad, I'm sure that Steve thought that it was necessary for the diesels. Why no diesel on the way TO Denver? Maybe because he just wanted to show off, he didn't tell me and I didn't ask, I just enjoyed the show. If you don't like the thought of a UP Steamer leading a UP diesel, see my last sentence of the paragraph above.

Remember, both the UP and BNSF are in the Railroad BUSINESS, not in the Railfan business. Running steam is totally optional and on the BN (while Louie Menk was alive) was totally verboten. If you want Steam on the High Iron to continue, don't bite the hand that feeds you and enjoy what you get.

Rick



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/27/2009 08:03PM by Rick Steele.
Subject Author Posted

RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger February 25, 2009 10:54AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Curtis_F February 25, 2009 12:16PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Samart February 25, 2009 05:16PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Will Gant February 25, 2009 07:31PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

South Park February 25, 2009 09:50PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger February 26, 2009 05:42AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

kbarnett February 26, 2009 09:55AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Chile John February 26, 2009 10:07AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

kbarnett February 26, 2009 10:33AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Chile John February 26, 2009 12:31PM

Re: RGS #20 frame Attachments

dandtsrr2 February 26, 2009 06:17PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Chile John February 26, 2009 07:45PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Rick Steele February 26, 2009 08:11PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Will Gant February 26, 2009 08:25PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

dandtsrr2 February 26, 2009 09:54PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Rick Steele February 27, 2009 07:58PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

dandtsrr2 February 27, 2009 09:57PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Rick Steele February 28, 2009 07:15AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

dandtsrr2 March 01, 2009 12:48AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

John Cole March 01, 2009 08:30AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Rick Steele March 02, 2009 07:10AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

myork March 02, 2009 03:29PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger February 26, 2009 05:30AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

HighCommander March 11, 2009 11:23AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger March 11, 2009 12:50PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

HighCommander March 11, 2009 02:30PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Will Gant March 11, 2009 03:12PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger February 26, 2009 05:27AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

rod February 26, 2009 10:13AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger March 02, 2009 07:38AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Will Gant March 02, 2009 10:28AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

mesaman3000 February 26, 2009 09:04PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger March 02, 2009 07:42AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

jcpatten February 27, 2009 05:19AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

mesaman3000 February 27, 2009 02:03PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

GeorgeGaskill February 27, 2009 03:11PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Linn W. Moedinger March 02, 2009 07:45AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

SandingValve March 02, 2009 09:03PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

tractor February 27, 2009 01:20AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

K-27 Afficianado March 02, 2009 09:10PM

Re: RGS #20 frame

Bill Dennehy March 09, 2009 08:29AM

Re: RGS #20 frame

John Hewlett March 11, 2009 04:20PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login